Is AI the new dawn for modeling sites

 

Simon Carter said, 1730971851

AI can already generate pretty much any still image I can conceive of.

What it can't do is recreate the transient relationship between photographer, model, environment & client. That's the bit I relish - both the process and the results. And that's the heart of portraiture.

JPea said, 1730972065

I have never been a follower of " getting it right in the camera".

I am not trying to record the world as it is but I am making images that are floating around in my head.

The techniques I use to achieve this , for me, don't matter. Merely the result.

I will use people to get this result however, simply because I like being and working with people.

Commercially companies will employ techniques that are the best balance between cost and result.

As an amateur I don't mind what others do.

-sp●●n- said, 1730972941

SunrisePhoto said

Serious photo businesses class AI as junk and sooner or later people get tired of clicking though AI generated insta pictures.


Nope, there is real savings to be made and almost all businesses will transition over the next number of years, at the end of the day, if something costs 10x more than something else and the results are similar then the cheaper option will be chosen:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-10-31/mango-clothing-uses-ai-to-replace-some-fashion-models-in-ads 

Edited by -sp●●n-

Admin said, 1730973382

This post has been moved from the General Chat group to the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Discussion group.

Joining this group is as easy as viewing the group and then clicking 'Join group' near the top right.

SunrisePhoto said, 1730976014

-sp●●n- said

SunrisePhoto said

Serious photo businesses class AI as junk and sooner or later people get tired of clicking though AI generated insta pictures.


Nope, there is real savings to be made and almost all businesses will transition over the next number of years, at the end of the day, if something costs 10x more than something else and the results are similar then the cheaper option will be chosen:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-10-31/mango-clothing-uses-ai-to-replace-some-fashion-models-in-ads 

Edited by -sp●●n-


This is actually a different topic. I'm talking about photo businesses that rely in authenticity of the content. Fashion houses sell clothes and not photos. I've read on other threads that this site doesn't do ID check for new models when they sign on? Is that really the case?

How about demanding accompanying RAW file with photo uploads for checking?

Sensual Art said, 1730983882

SunrisePhoto said

-sp●●n- said

SunrisePhoto said

Serious photo businesses class AI as junk and sooner or later people get tired of clicking though AI generated insta pictures.

Nope, there is real savings to be made and almost all businesses will transition over the next number of years, at the end of the day, if something costs 10x more than something else and the results are similar then the cheaper option will be chosen:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-10-31/mango-clothing-uses-ai-to-replace-some-fashion-models-in-ads 

This is actually a different topic. I'm talking about photo businesses that rely in authenticity of the content. Fashion houses sell clothes and not photos.

I'm amused that you claim it to be a different topic, when he responded directly to one of the points you raised in your opening post.

SunrisePhoto said

I've read on other threads that this site doesn't do ID check for new models when they sign on? Is that really the case?

How about demanding accompanying RAW file with photo uploads for checking?

It's these two points that are separate from your OP.  If you want to discuss them, I recommend a separate post, but be ready to provide evidence that there's an actual problem that needs solving, and simply your postulating.

Gothic Image said, 1730987219

I don't understand what ID checks have to do with the subject, or anything else for that matter?

Huw said, 1730988961

SunrisePhoto said


This is actually a different topic. I'm talking about photo businesses that rely in authenticity of the content. Fashion houses sell clothes and not photos. I've read on other threads that this site doesn't do ID check for new models when they sign on? Is that really the case?

How about demanding accompanying RAW file with photo uploads for checking?

Yep.


https://zamurovicbrothers.thinkific.com/courses/aiproductfashion


Huw said, 1730998357

Is AI the new dawn for photography in general?

Maybe that's what the bright light I see on the horizon is, a new dawn.
Oh not, there's a mushrom cloud now.
Maybe not a new dawn after all.

Hope that's not too dark ;)

SunrisePhoto said, 1731011024

Gothic Image said

I don't understand what ID checks have to do with the subject, or anything else for that matter?


Malicious people have been stealing photos from insta for ages to create fake profiles. Generative AI can create scarily realistic photos based on photos of real people and the technology is developing with leaps. ID check by the site would be a safety measure to convince photographers to book models in the net.

Gothic Image said, 1731012154

Ah, so you're worried about fake model profiles?