Bluesky Anyone?

 

waist.it said, 1732045466

MidgePhoto said

Bluesky depends on a single nodal point owned by a company, the relay servers, although they distribute some storage to users.

That is the same vulnerability to assorted failures and nastinesses as Xitter.

The Fediverse - Mastodon, Pixelview and a few other apps - is properly distributed. 

Photog.social is a server that is what it sounds like; I've not seen one called models.social but I'd not rule it out; and kinkyelephant.social is related to a model on here.

One need not set up one's own, but can't be stopped from doing so. And then looking for others that will federate.


True though as I understand it AT (aka Atmosphere)is an open protocol and could be used independently of the central server. Biggest issue - again as understand it - is that Atmosphere protocol is currently incompatible with the Fediverse.

However, my impression is that is the main driver underlying the move to BlueSky is not a technical one. It's more to do with giving the proverbial finger to Elmo... ;-)

Kirk Schwarz said, 1732045499

MidgePhoto said

Bluesky depends on a single nodal point owned by a company, the relay servers, although they distribute some storage to users.

That is the same vulnerability to assorted failures and nastinesses as Xitter.

The Fediverse - Mastodon, Pixelview and a few other apps - is properly distributed. 

Photog.social is a server that is what it sounds like; I've not seen one called models.social but I'd not rule it out; and kinkyelephant.social is related to a model on here.

One need not set up one's own, but can't be stopped from doing so. And then looking for others that will federate.


I think the 'nastiness' on Twitter has come about from the people that use it, and the failure, the man that owns it. 

RAWing Waves said, 1732045935

Just joined rawingwaves.bsky.social

Edited by RAWing Waves

Paul Archer Photography said, 1732047829

I have also joined Bluesky - it looks very promising, I hope it is successful!

https://bsky.app/profile/paularchertog.bsky.social 

Mark Goddard said, 1732048078

markgoddard59.bsky.social

Huw said, 1732484596

Huw said, 1732484692

.

Edited by Huw

harbuzenger said, 1732486967

Alright. I’ll give it a go. I’m on there as Harbuzenger, surprisingly.

Starglider Photography said, 1732555619

Here's me!

https://bsky.app/profile/stargliderphotos.bsky.social

So much better than the 'others'.

BigBaldTone said, 1732608730

https://bsky.app/profile/bigbaldtone.bsky.social

CalmNudes said, 1734470307

It's working out pretty well for me - getting more traction there than I've ever had here. And then there was this https://bsky.app/profile/calmnudes.bsky.social/post/3ldeafvtoo22k 

I put this up    

and got  a love from (what claims to be) Debbie Harry. 


Edited by CalmNudes

Edited by CalmNudes