Home » Your Groups » Coronavirus (COVID-19): Discussion, data, and advice » New coronavirus study recalls Germany's 'Patient Zero'

New coronavirus study recalls Germany's 'Patient Zero'

mmmfotografie.nl

By mmmfotografie.nl, 1589795032

Interviews with 16 patients infected by a visiting Chinese colleague at a company in southern Germany reaffirms that the virus often stays hidden. Most of them exhibited no or only mild symptoms, researchers say.

Global efforts to contain Covid-19 still face a "huge challenge," warns The Lancet Infectious Diseases magazine in a Bavaria case study confirming that some patients were infected before symptoms emerged or only as they started.

The London-based medical publisher focused on Europe's first case in January, explaining how the virus Sars-Cov-2 spread from a Chinese colleague visiting Munich to workmates of the firm Webasto and then their households.

From "Patient Zero" a sequence of four "generations" of infection was traced with "all patients recovered fully" via quarantine, said the magazine, citing testing and interviews done mainly by German epidemiologists and health authorities.

The potentially lethal virus' incubation period — between initial infection and symptoms — was four days, concluded the authors, who included Chinese and Spanish contributors. 

Hidden infectiousness

Viral transmission to one and up to "possibly five more" patients had occurred before symptoms became apparent; in at least four cases on the day of symptom onset and the remainder once symptoms were apparent, according to the study.

That pattern of hidden "infectiousness was "substantial" and had also thrown up "false-negative tests," suggesting infection was present but only became evident later.

Bavaria study matches other evidence

The data from "Patient 0" matched other results that suggested the occurrence of pre-symptomatic transmission was estimated at up to half of all infections, said infectiology researchers at Cologne's University Clinic [Uniklinik Köln] in a Lancet commentary.

"This is one of the most serious obstacles to controlling the pandemic,'' said the Cologne team, adding: "new technologies such as contact tracking apps are urgently needed to effectively control the pandemic."

"All countries that have introduced rigorous contact tracing were most effective in keeping the number of newly infected small, said Annelies Wilder-Smith of the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM). 

She cited South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Thailand, Vietnam and Singapore as "clear examples of countries that do not economize on resources and technology to carry out rigorous contact tracing. All were successful."

Deprived more at risk

Germany's Welt am Sonntag newspaper in a four-page Sunday special entitled "The Wasted Weeks" quoted German Health Minister Jens Spahn at the end of January — when the Webasto case had just emerged in Munich — as saying that the course of the disease was "relatively moderate."

Already on Januar 22, virologist Alexander Kekule on during a television science broadcast had contradicted Germany's Robert Koch Institute, saying: "I also reckon on cases in Europe; we must also prepare ourselves for them in Germany."

Another study published Friday by The Lancet, conducted by University of Oxford researchers, found that people living in the most deprived areas of Britain were more than four times likelier to test positive for COVID-19 than those living in the richest neighborhoods. 

The Oxford study looked at more than 3,600 COVID-19 test results from national programs and found that statistical deprivation, age and chronic liver disease all increased the likelihood of testing positive. 

Among its sample of 660 people living in most deprived areas, 29.5 percent had tested positive, compared with just 7.7 percent of those in richer areas, the study found.  

https://www.dw.com/en/new-coronavirus-study-recalls-germanys-patient-zero/a-53473882

Richard Winn said, 1589835180

The large scale study in Iceland initially found that 50% of cases were asymptomatic. However, the patients eventually did show symptoms after follow-up. I suspect that many of the cases who were asymptomatic had mild symptoms that they didn't notice or register as COVID-19-related. The problem is, many of the symptoms are non-specific, making it difficult to know whether the symptoms they were exhibiting were due to COVID-19 or a different respiratory disease. It is only now, since other respiratory viruses have largely disappeared, that it is more clearly COVID-19.

There are many reasons why deprived areas have higher levels of spread, but I think it is more important to determine why that is, as it may not be just down to being deprived and it is important to determine cause and effect. Some of it may be down to overcrowded living conditions, but it could also be down to job roles.

MidgePhoto said, 1589836258

Symptoms starting before infection occurred would be surprising. It may be translation.

A feature of C19 is that the entirely usual period of infectiousness before symptoms appear is long compared to most viruses.