Poll for a SFW version of Purpleport
tandi said, 1726668672
Barney57 said
In response to your original post, I would not prefer a NSFW version of PP. After reading through the comments I appear not to be the only one, indeed the overwhelming majority of comments suggest others would not prefer a NSFW version of PP.
Moving on ….
Eloquently put, thousands of members and 30 people voice an opinion, I love a democracy :-)
Huw said
PP sits neatly between Instagram and Only Fans.
There was a similar site which went NSFW a few years ago.
Can't remember its name, although I may still have a portfolio on it.
I bet you do, don't Huw :-)
J H Photos said
Pointless. As many have said, just use filters.
Are you 100% open to photography other than NSFW, if so please use your filter ;-)
Edited by tandi
Gerry99111 said, 1726669208
I wouldn't. Virtually all my model images on Instagram would be classed as NSFW on here, so see zero interest in investing in a portfolio that ig would allow but pp wouldn't. I am not convinced model sites in their current form are the future of booking shoots for a good proportion of people.
I also post everything apart from my avatar as NSFW as I would rather not have sfw only people assume I shoot strictly clothed, because I don't and don't want those people to see something I am not promoting.
I also on principal would rather have nothing to do with nude prudes who scorn or start lecturing which too many do. I have no problem with people who shoot very low levels and have worked with some, but when they decide others shouldn't also, I don't want to provide any support
Edited by Gerry99111
Barney57 said, 1726669084
tandi said
Barney57 said
In response to your original post, I would not prefer a NSFW version of PP. After reading through the comments I appear not to be the only one, indeed the overwhelming majority of comments suggest others would not prefer a NSFW version of PP.
Moving on ….
Eloquently put, thousands of members and 30 people voice an opinion, I love a democracy :-)
Were you expecting the thousands of members who haven’t contributed yet to do so anytime soon? And since when has any site on the internet been a democracy.
In common with many sites, those who contribute are a small minority of the overall membership.
tandi said, 1726669417
Barney57 said
Were you expecting the thousands of members who haven’t contributed yet to do so anytime soon? And since when has any site on the internet been a democracy.In common with many sites, those who contribute are a small minority of the overall membership.
The only foolish question is the one never asked !
Forgive my quotation, it seemed only fair!
Barney57 said, 1726669827
tandi said
Barney57 said
Were you expecting the thousands of members who haven’t contributed yet to do so anytime soon? And since when has any site on the internet been a democracy.In common with many sites, those who contribute are a small minority of the overall membership.
The only foolish question is the one never asked !Forgive my quotation, it seemed only fair!
For someone who would have known what this site consisted of in terms of content, and states isn’t going to do any actual modelling, then the foolishness might be joining the site. Forgive my comment, it seemed only fair!
tandi said, 1726670177
Barney57 said
tandi said
Barney57 said
Were you expecting the thousands of members who haven’t contributed yet to do so anytime soon? And since when has any site on the internet been a democracy.In common with many sites, those who contribute are a small minority of the overall membership.
The only foolish question is the one never asked !Forgive my quotation, it seemed only fair!
For someone who would have known what this site consisted of in terms of content, and states isn’t going to do any actual modelling, then the foolishness might be joining the site. Forgive my comment, it seemed only fair!
Technically if everything defaults to SFW when you join and you have to turn off a NSFW filter to view your profile, is the default not an SFW website with the addition of displaying your content if a visitor member wishes to. I am only asking the question is there a need for anything other than default configuration of SFW.
:-)
tandi said, 1726670283
DJ200 said
No
Congrats, It's a Yes and No question, I appreciate your honesty ;-)
tandi said, 1726670573
Chris13 said
It's there already, top right hand corner! It's called 'Settings'!!
No Chris, you have to turn on NSFW to show NSFW, default is SFW, this is actually by default an SFW site which allows you to view NSFW if you really wish to !
Barney57 said, 1726670616
tandi said
Barney57 said
tandi said
Barney57 said
Were you expecting the thousands of members who haven’t contributed yet to do so anytime soon? And since when has any site on the internet been a democracy.In common with many sites, those who contribute are a small minority of the overall membership.
The only foolish question is the one never asked !Forgive my quotation, it seemed only fair!
For someone who would have known what this site consisted of in terms of content, and states isn’t going to do any actual modelling, then the foolishness might be joining the site. Forgive my comment, it seemed only fair!
Technically if everything defaults to SFW when you join and you have to turn off a NSFW filter to view your profile, is the default not an SFW website with the addition of displaying your content if a visitor member wishes to. I am only asking the question is there a need for anything other than default configuration of SFW.:-)
No, there isn’t a need.
tandi said, 1726670683
Barney57 said
tandi said
Barney57 said
tandi said
Barney57 said
Were you expecting the thousands of members who haven’t contributed yet to do so anytime soon? And since when has any site on the internet been a democracy.In common with many sites, those who contribute are a small minority of the overall membership.
The only foolish question is the one never asked !Forgive my quotation, it seemed only fair!
For someone who would have known what this site consisted of in terms of content, and states isn’t going to do any actual modelling, then the foolishness might be joining the site. Forgive my comment, it seemed only fair!
Technically if everything defaults to SFW when you join and you have to turn off a NSFW filter to view your profile, is the default not an SFW website with the addition of displaying your content if a visitor member wishes to. I am only asking the question is there a need for anything other than default configuration of SFW.:-)
No, there isn’t a need.
And I appreciate your opinion ;-)
Malbon said, 1726671692
Maybe you could just create a 100% SFW portfolio on a different site and ensure that viewers who might be offended by nudity etc are only directed to that one?
It is and always has been part of PP's DNA to permit and display NSFW images, I would be surprised if they wanted to change that now.
YorVikIng said, 1726674550
tandi said
Though why show the NSFW icon, it shouldn't do that, it highlights that there is naughty content, that you can view if you turn off the NSFW filter :-)
Also why is the NSFW filter a cookie and not a user setting :-)
Edited by tandi
Yes! When browsing NSFW there should be no visual clues (other than the relevant setting) to the existence of stuff that has been filtered out.