Best Photographers on Purpleport

 

This post has been locked.

Theta Aeterna said, 1726241904

indemnity said

 Your search is over. :) 


I love it :)

Raj Singh said, 1726242332

tandi

I think you’ll find the stats in the opening post of this thread link interesting:

Sorry, can’t make it clickable from my phone but someone else may be able to.

Or just cut and paste it into your browser…

Here’s a highlight;

“2% of members account for 80% of all (sic FPI) awards ever given”.

If all you’re interested in is seeing their work you will miss some wonderful gems of the remaining 98% of members.

I worked with several I spotted in the new upload feed who had never had an FPI at the time, perhaps they were newbies here, but regardless I loved their work or saw their potential and made contact.

https://purpleport.com/group/let-s-talk-about-fpis/188314/Confessions-of-a-freelance-screenscraper/

Tabitha Boydell said, 1726242578

I keep getting notifications that I am being quoted in this thread....but I am not.

RAWing Waves said, 1726242810

Tabitha Boydell said

I keep getting notifications that I am being quoted in this thread....but I am not.


Sure you aren't just getting notifications because you are subscribed to the thread

Tabitha Boydell said, 1726242870

RAWing Waves said

Tabitha Boydell said

I keep getting notifications that I am being quoted in this thread....but I am not.


Sure you aren't just getting notifications because you are subscribed to the thread


No because then I would not have a problem

Tabitha Boydell said, 1726242903

Theta Aeterna mentioned you in the Best Photographers on Purpleport post in the General Chat group.

tandi mentioned you in the Best Photographers on Purpleport post in the General Chat group.


and 5 more times

Gothic Image said, 1726242919

Tabitha Boydell said

I keep getting notifications that I am being quoted in this thread....but I am not.


I quoted you early on?

Tabitha Boydell said, 1726243022

Gothic Image said

Tabitha Boydell said

I keep getting notifications that I am being quoted in this thread....but I am not.


I quoted you early on?


Yeah that's fine, I just got a lot more notifications that are false. For example, the one above. That person only posted once on this thread and did't quote me

Buggy!

RAWing Waves said, 1726243050

Tabitha Boydell said

RAWing Waves said

Tabitha Boydell said

I keep getting notifications that I am being quoted in this thread....but I am not.


Sure you aren't just getting notifications because you are subscribed to the thread


No because then I would not have a problem


ok just trying to help

Gothic Image said, 1726243151

Tabitha Boydell said

Gothic Image said

Tabitha Boydell said

I keep getting notifications that I am being quoted in this thread....but I am not.


I quoted you early on?


Yeah that's fine, I just got a lot more notifications that are false. For example, the one above. That person only posted once on this thread and did't quote me

Buggy!


Bizarre!

Tabitha Boydell said, 1726243164

RAWing Waves said

Tabitha Boydell said

RAWing Waves said

Tabitha Boydell said

I keep getting notifications that I am being quoted in this thread....but I am not.


Sure you aren't just getting notifications because you are subscribed to the thread


No because then I would not have a problem


ok just trying to help


No problem - I have used the site for 10 years so understand the difference between those notifications :) 

Raj Singh said, 1726243629

Tabitha Boydell

“Yeah that's fine, I just got a lot more notifications that are false. For example, the one above. That person only posted once on this thread and did't quote me

Buggy!”

But.. but…. I did kinda indirectly reference you my dear..

You’re one of the 2%

… if not the 1% club 😉!

I think there’s a secret algorithm at play 😂😂

Edited by Raj Singh

Unfocussed Mike said, 1726245197

Tabitha Boydell at a guess (I am on my phone so can’t easily check) you are still referenced in the HTML markup of a reply somehow, even though you have been edited out of it visibly. AFAIR There’s some hidden HTML on containing wrappers that gets carried forwards, and perhaps the WYSIWYG editor didn’t fully remove it.

Art Asylum Reloaded Photo Studio said, 1726245346

Tabitha Boydell yeah I have been here a long time too so was just a suggestion

Sorry on my studio page again lol

Edited by Art Asylum Reloaded Photo Studio

Unfocussed Mike said, 1726247020

Unfocussed Mike said

Tabitha Boydell at a guess (I am on my phone so can’t easily check) you are still referenced in the HTML markup of a reply somehow, even though you have been edited out of it visibly. AFAIR There’s some hidden HTML on containing wrappers that gets carried forwards, and perhaps the WYSIWYG editor didn’t fully remove it.

And indeed that is exactly it:

Basically it is Theta Aeterna 's fault ;-) He must have started by replying to you on something, edited out the text, typed something else, and somehow it has ended up attributed to you, because TinyMCE (the WYSIWYG editor Purpleport uses) is a pile of unmentionable. (But also because relying on user-supplied markup is not really a sustainable way to implement threaded conversation! This could be abused)

Edit: Actually it might originally be indemnity 's fault? But you can see (if you know any HTML) that there is some corrupted markup somewhere. Every time someone replies to either of those two comments, that misattribution is going to lead to you being notified that you are being quoted. 

Edited by Unfocussed Mike