AI and plagurism

The Ghost of Prancy McPrettykins oh, OK, I need to take another look. When I referred to generated models I meant exactly that. randomly generated, ultra realistic, very beautiful, long dark hair, blue eyes etc and when it generates what you want, go from there. Keep changing the setting. Atm, I can't use real people with generated AI, I'm not sure if I will be able to change my mindset on that. The more you use AI the easier it is to see.

I don't know what stable defusion xl is or the IP adaptor.

Lol the account for the original image has been deactivated...one can guess why.

Edited by -sp●●n-

-sp●●n- said

Lol the account for the original image has been deactivated...one can guess why.

Edited by -sp●●n-

Interesting, you really opened Pandora's Box, didn't you!  :-)

-sp●●n- said

Lol the account for the original image has been deactivated...one can guess why.

Edited by -sp●●n-

It's interesting how putting a yellow blob on the picture fooled the image search software.
Same on the other stolen picture.

I'd love to know what he thought when you messaged him and asked to use the photo for a post on plagiarism   :) 

-sp●●n- said

Lol the account for the original image has been deactivated...one can guess why.

Edited by -sp●●n-

TBH it's a bit more than a guess but I have reason to believe it's because he had been asked by admin to provide proof that he had taken certain photographs which appeared in his portfolio, including the one you edited without the permission of the rightful copyright owner/photographer, but could not provide it so permanently deactivated before being given the boot.

I wonder how many of the 60 odd PP models he had worked with were taken in by his plagiarism and patter, only to receive a pile of poo in exchange for their time.

FiL said

-sp●●n- said

Lol the account for the original image has been deactivated...one can guess why.

Edited by -sp●●n-

TBH it's a bit more than a guess but I have reason to believe it's because he had been asked by admin to provide proof that he had taken certain photographs which appeared in his portfolio, including the one you edited without the permission of the rightful copyright owner/photographer, but could not provide it so permanently deactivated before being given the boot.

I wonder how many of the 60 odd PP models he had worked with were taken in by his plagiarism and patter, only to receive a pile of poo in exchange for their time.

The TF shoots must have been disappointing!

;)

Huw said

FiL said

-sp●●n- said

Lol the account for the original image has been deactivated...one can guess why.

Edited by -sp●●n-

TBH it's a bit more than a guess but I have reason to believe it's because he had been asked by admin to provide proof that he had taken certain photographs which appeared in his portfolio, including the one you edited without the permission of the rightful copyright owner/photographer, but could not provide it so permanently deactivated before being given the boot.

I wonder how many of the 60 odd PP models he had worked with were taken in by his plagiarism and patter, only to receive a pile of poo in exchange for their time.

The TF shoots must have been disappointing!

;)

Yep, and I suspect a Sarf-London accent didn't live up to the sophisticated Italian charm models might have anticipated either.

While it may have seemed petty, fakers and con-men lose us some good models.

Edited by Huw

Huw said

While it may have seemed petty, fakers and con-men lose us some good models.

Edited by Huw

Indeed, virtually every model starts out with no decent pictures and needs to get a good TFP shoot under their belt to show their true worth. If that shoot is a disaster because the 'photographer' had intended to deceive the model purely to shoot some fresh meat, they probably won't continue.