AI and plagurism
Huw said, 1699297720
FiL said
Do you believe that AI was not involved in the creation of the first image you posted (I don't)?
If it was involved, what does it matter if the subsequently posted images also involved AI in their production?
Well the model is here, on PP, and she looks like she does in that photo.
Changing backgrounds has been going on for at least 100 years.
It's just got easier.
-sp●●n- said, 1699297727
Huw guys put the pitch forks away, the owner of the image was contacted by PM and was ok with the idea…
Huw said, 1699297891
-sp●●n- said, 1699298032
Huw what and miss all the frothing at the mouth and the moral outrage?
I like the idea of a plagiarism post that plagiarises, if you can get your head around that one :)
Huw said, 1699298122
-sp●●n- said, 1699298161
Actually if the original image has people thinking it is AI then if I was the author then I would take that as a compliment, it says to people that a real skill was used to create the image (a non ai image)
Kirk Schwarz said, 1699302096
GPA6 said
Kirk Schwarz said
GPA6 if you’ve bought a new camera in the last five years, you automatically rely on some kind of ‘AI’ in the final images.
I'm not sure what that has to do with this subject Kirk?
Just that new cameras are packed with AI. It isn't something that only takes place after the fact, it's embedded now into the core of every new camera and image.
Kirk Schwarz said, 1699302120
Gothic Image said
Kirk Schwarz said
Photowallah In all fairness, ageism aside, I suspect the new, and very valid language of today’s youth is no longer your language.
Just as the language of your forefathers should not be yours now.
I don't think that was quite the point he was making?
I know. But its tinterwebs init.
GPA6 said, 1699303960
Kirk Schwarz but it doesn't change how the image looks does it? My 5D MKiii images look pretty much the same as my R6. I miss focus less with the R6 though.
Kirk Schwarz said, 1699304259
GPA6 said
Kirk Schwarz but it doesn't change how the image looks does it? My 5D MKiii images look pretty much the same as my R6. I miss focus less with the R6 though.
It helps with enhancing your images. Subtle, yes, but there and growing, I would assume.
Not just the deep learning AF algorithms that help you miss less, but also:
- Super-resolution: AI algorithms can upscale low-resolution images by reconstructing high-frequency details and textures. This process, known as super-resolution, generates a higher-resolution image without sacrificing quality.
- Noise reduction: AI can effectively reduce image noise caused by low-light conditions or high ISO settings. By analyzing and differentiating between noise patterns and image details, AI can suppress noise while preserving essential information.
- High dynamic range (HDR): AI can help merge multiple exposures of the same scene into a single image with an extended dynamic range, preserving details in both the shadows and highlights. This creates a more balanced image with increased details and richer colors.
- Color correction and white balance: AI algorithms can analyze an image and make automatic adjustments to color temperature, saturation, and contrast, resulting in more accurate colors and improved overall image quality.
- Object and scene recognition: AI can identify and recognize objects, scenes, and even people within an image, enabling cameras to automatically adjust settings and apply appropriate image enhancements based on the subject matter.
- Autofocus and stabilization: AI can assist with faster and more accurate autofocus (see above), as well as image stabilization, by predicting subject motion and compensating for camera shake in real-time.
It's fascinating how much it will creep in without realising. The next 10 years will be very exciting.
-sp●●n- said, 1699305037
I have noticed AI on the latest iPhone, it takes an image and bang can see the result, then a second or so later a very much clearer and better image replaces it.
GPA6 said, 1699308575
-sp●●n- said
I have noticed AI on the latest iPhone, it takes an image and bang can see the result, then a second or so later a very much clearer and better image replaces it.
spoon, I have seen some investigation into this, apparently, the phone recognises the subject and replaces it with a sharp image. It uses the type of Ai that we have been referring to here. It uses stock photos and just replaces it. I saw it demo'd on some lunar pictures. It's no longer the picture that you took. The thing is, it's no longer the picture you took! so why take it? lol its very confusing.
FiL said, 1699316070
Huw said
FiL said
Do you believe that AI was not involved in the creation of the first image you posted (I don't)?
If it was involved, what does it matter if the subsequently posted images also involved AI in their production?
Well the model is here, on PP, and she looks like she does in that photo.Changing backgrounds has been going on for at least 100 years.
It's just got easier.
Really?
Do you think the photographer is here too??
Gothic Image said, 1699334406
Huw said
FiL said
Do you believe that AI was not involved in the creation of the first image you posted (I don't)?
If it was involved, what does it matter if the subsequently posted images also involved AI in their production?
Well the model is here, on PP, and she looks like she does in that photo.Changing backgrounds has been going on for at least 100 years.
It's just got easier.
How do you know the model is on PP as she isn't credited?