ADWsPhotos said
I did a number of remote shoots during the first phases of COVID, some using very simple tech (meaning the model only had, say, an iPhone which I could control) and others where the model had a setup llinking to an SLR which allowed me a lot more control.
In those times it enabled photographers / models who were keen to continue to produce images. My take on it was that it was incredibly hard work for the model who had to set up her place, understand how to light herself, then, if if things needed to move 2 inches to the left move it, then go back to modelling. Some models are really well equipped to do the tech stuff (especially in my experience, those who had a supportive partner)
And then very, VERY dependent on the connection between myself and the model. I did shoots which were, in my view, pretty cool, and others that, not due to the model but due to their internet connection, were like pulling teeth. I'd try to control the model's camera / phone / ... and many seconds later the picture would swim into view
I have a great number of very happy memories of those shoots, some which beggar belief. I like to think, in many instances, the models and I created some very cool images that aren't evidently remote. I'm not going to post them here, simply not to be tedious, but feel free to ask.
Now, with things as they are, if someone was at the other side of the world I was crazy keen to shoot, I'd consider it (I know a model in the US who bought kit to not only be able to change the focal length of a zoom lens, but move the camera along a track, all controlled remotely so the photographer can 'move'.
Currently I'm not really interested in remote shooting (despite getting what I felt / feel are decent images) unless there's some location I really can't do with a local model (plus of course that we can work out how to shoot the model in the location
.
I had my 35th remote shoot of 2023 on Sunday, and have one scheduled for this Wednesday, and one more at the end of the month. Next year will probably be somewhat similar, though most likely with fewer but somewhat more elaborate shoots.
I will note that some studios are now offering remote setups, which expands the potential model base; a few of my remotes were with models who do not provide remote capabilities themselves. In those circumstances, the constant context-switching from model-photographer-model is eliminated, which has got to be helpful for the model. On the other hand, I've had a lot of successful shoots where it was just me, the model, and bunch of intermediary software and computers.
As you note, one big advantage is the ability to work with models over 5000 miles away--I'm based in California USA, and I've been able to work with models in the UK, Norway, Russia, and elsewhere. There's no way I'd have been able to do that otherwise.