ANDY00 wrote... "Anyone who says FPIs mean nothing is simply wrong. Let’s be honest, we’re here to create and showcase our work, right? FPIs bring more views, more likes, and a lot more attention to your portfolio. Sure, some might claim they don’t care who looks at their work, but let's face it—if you’re posting your creations, you’re hoping people will see and appreciate them. An FPI just helps boost that visibility."
Yep. It brings more traffic to ones profile for a few hours. That's got to be good.
But apart from that... I've had a few FPIs but I've never been offered fame or and fortune, and an FPI has never resulted in models queuing outside my front door (I keep looking, but the garden path is invariably empty). Even more disappointing is that neither Cameron Diaz or Salma Hayek has ever begged me for a shoot.
Starglider Photography said
Gaining loves, comments and views aren't what people are referring to when saying "stop worrying about FPIs". It's that they rarely gain further bookings and outside of the site they mean literally nothing. Typically when people are told not to worry about them, it's because that person is usually chasing them for the wrong reasons.
The bit in bold... This is one of my hobby horses. A lot of people seem to think that an FPI is an award for excellence. This has probably been fostered by the site's references to an FPI being 'awarded'. No - it is NOT an award for excellence. As has been pointed out many times, if a pic hits the front page it's simply that a certain proportion of the PPCT folk consider it to be a decent advert for the site. That's all.
As I said above, an FPI is useful as a promotional tool for a few hours, but to repeat yet again it is NOT an award for excellence. If the site were to remove the various references to it being an award, a helluva lot of the 'my work is better than that' bickering would stop. Please. Pretty please. Ever so pretty please.