Home » Your Groups » General Chat » Photographers - getting value from paid shoots

Photographers - getting value from paid shoots

 

Paul Gerrard

By Paul Gerrard, 1729337819

Hi All

Just been reading the "Level playing field" thread from yesterday on the topic of paid / TF shoots and it brings up a couple of questions that have been on my mind for some time...

Brief background... I shoot almost entirely TF but do most of my shoots in Italy as the model photography scene here in Ireland is somewhat limited and between dismal weather, limited daylight for many months of the year and lack of studio or suitably photogenic home I don't really have anywhere to shoot much of the time. Italy works for me - I go for a long weekend, book a nice apartment in a city where models are located and I can generally find models happy to shoot TF. But I am increasingly finding that the models I really want to shoot with work for pay only and also any of the top UK/international models on PP that tour Ireland are expecting to be paid too so I haven't been working with any of them.  

I totally get that photography is a hobby and most hobbies cost money (glad I'm not into golf!) and if I'm willing to pay for cameras, lenses etc. it shouldn't be out of the question to pay for models and/or locations too. The problem I have right now is that I don't really feel I have any outlet for my work that justifies expensive shoots - I post a few photos on PP and also Instagram but I'm not really doing anything else with my images. PP has a good community, and it's great to get an occasional FPI but at the same time it's definitely a limited audience and it's geared towards single high quality images rather than sets of photos which also limits usable output and the reach from any given shoot.  Instagram meanwhile has declining engagement, increasing censorship, shadowbans, etc so feels a lot less rewarding as a place to share work than it once was. And both platforms have low resolution that often disappoints after editing photos on a large 4k monitor. So spending a lot on money on a model and/or location for the final output to be a few small, low-res images than get viewed for a second or two by a handful of people on social media doesn't really feel like money well spent!

So my question to all photographers who are regularly paying models for shoots is how do you feel you're getting your money's worth from it? Are you just enjoying the creative process of the shoot, the editing etc. and the personal satisfaction of looking at your completed work? (this is probably what's keeping me going above anything else!) Is sharing on PP or Instagram with the associated engagement your endgame? Or are there any other sharing sites, Flickr, Twitter etc that are working well for you? Or other outlets like prints, photobooks, exhibitions, magazine publications, that are perhaps more satisfying as a final output? 

And actually I have a second question! Are any photographers getting income directly from their model shoots? e.g. selling prints, paid sites like Patreon etc. I'm sure there's not too many people using model shoots as their primary income but even something like £50-£100 a month would create a budget for an occasional professional model shoot. I'm not asking what anyone earns but would like to hear from anyone that is offsetting the cost of model shoots with some revenue stream. Or how many people are earning money from another genre of photography (commercial, family photos, weddings etc.) that is creating a budget for models / locations?

I find myself at a bit of a crossroads, increasingly disillusioned with the social media side of things and I'm trying to figure out whether to just keep doing what I'm doing or should I be upping my game somehow and getting into doing paid shoots but with some other output/input to make it worthwhile 

This post has been locked.

Lenswonder said, 1729338343

Everyone goes on about the elves but elves can't even merge this thread with a similar one already going.

TedBancroftPortraits said, 1729338684

Getting value from a shoot?  That is easy, if I am not, then I don't book that model again.

Tabitha Boydell said, 1729338859

If you’re going to sell images you’ll probably find rates go up accordingly though

ANDY00 said, 1729339033

Tabitha Boydell said

If you’re going to sell images you’ll probably find rates go up accordingly though


Why ?

Orson Carter said, 1729339181

The value for me is enjoyment. 

I get a massive amount of enjoyment from spending a day collaborating (in a 'collaboration of ideas' sense) with a good, creative model. And as a lot of the models on the circuit are very lovely, very  active people with a wide range of skills and interests, that adds to the enjoyment. 

I've said it before but I'll say it again.. I bl**dy love this hobby. I can't put a price on the sheer enjoyment I get from it. 


Edited by Orson Carter

Tabitha Boydell said, 1729339695

ANDY00 a models commercial rate will be higher than her rate for non commercial

For example, a popular model on here is £400 a day. If you want her to sign a release to use the images commercially (e.g profit from their use) then it doubles. I know this because a photographer asked for a rate to use the images from a workshop commercially. Model may also agree to a profit share instead but because this is never known at the time of the shoot, she may well be better off with her commercial rate.

The extra fee is rightly charged, in my opinion. If it was work for a brand in the ‘real world’ and not the PP bubble then you’d be looking at that rate PLUS a buyout of 1-2k or even more depending on usage. One car brand that I know of, advertised a job with a 20k buyout

@Golding said, 1729340036

I hear part of what you are saying, TF has for the most part (for me anyway) fallen off a cliff. And there are well known factors for that which I totally understand. Also, I don't make a habit of asking models for TF, I just hope that sometimes they see a few images of mine they like and will contact me. It happens but only occasionally, and I don't think i'm a particularly shit photographer even. I think most photographers have found this since Covid and the cost of living disaster.

I've also reverted to a free member here because the amount of models in my area is just shocking. So many haven't logged in for half a year or more. I don't really see the point of paying for a site that is happy to leave accounts up that have been untouched for years in an attempt to make the site look busy.

Insta is just about dead, since I lost my account about 8 months ago and I had to start again i've been permanently shadow-banned, so only those who know me actually know I am there. Its rare I get a message on there to shoot either.

I am though, in the enviable position in the fact that my girlfriend is one of the most well known models on this site, so I usually have someone to practice on if I really want to shoot. I have no rights to grumble if I can't find anyone else to work with really.

What shocks me about your post though, is this line, I am increasingly finding that the models I really want to shoot with work for pay only and also any of the top UK/international models on PP that tour Ireland are expecting to be paid too so I haven't been working with any of them  and I'm honestly a tad shocked. Do you really expect a professional model to tour Ireland and be working TF with all the work and expense it entails them? 

And no, there are very few photographers out there making a living from shooting models, its a luxury really isn't it? It matters not what we have spent on kit, thats our choice at the end of the day and it doesn't mean a model has to work with us. You could try Patreon I guess, but you need a following, and you need to be posting content that can't be seen elsewhere for free. That alone would drive me nuts, knowing I have some great images I want to share but holding them back for an occasional fiver a month from someone.

I just read your post again and realised this was aimed at photographers who regularly pay for shoots and that isn't me, but even if it was, if I was enjoying my hobby then it would be a good thing, it doesn't have to have some sort of financial reward does it?

It seems like your idea of little trips to Italy to shoot is something to look into though. Am going to look into that!

You have some lovely images on your portfolio though (particularly the mono work), but so do many photographers, and any decent model shooting TF is going to be considering just who they give their time to very carefully indeed I think.



Edited by @Golding

ANDY00 said, 1729340418

Tabitha Boydell said

ANDY00 a models commercial rate will be higher than her rate for non commercial

For example, a popular model on here is £400 a day. If you want her to sign a release to use the images commercially (e.g profit from their use) then it doubles. I know this because a photographer asked for a rate to use the images from a workshop commercially. Model may also agree to a profit share instead but because this is never known at the time of the shoot, she may well be better off with her commercial rate.

The extra fee is rightly charged, in my opinion. If it was work for a brand in the ‘real world’ and not the PP bubble then you’d be looking at that rate PLUS a buyout of 1-2k or even more depending on usage. One car brand that I know of, advertised a job with a 20k buyout


Firstly, if you hire a model for a shoot, you own the copyright to the images—you don’t need a release to sell them. Secondly, many models do paid work and receive images, which they then sell on platforms like OnlyFans and Patreon without lowering their rates or obtaining written consent from the photographer. A shoot is a shoot: if you pay a model, you own the copyright and can use the images as you see fit. There’s no expectation to disclose how the images will be used after the shoot

Basically, a photographer and model agree on what the shoot will entail and the rates for the day before the shoot takes place. If everyone agrees and goes ahead with the shoot, the model cannot come back later and demand more money just because the photographer might earn money from the images. The terms were set before the shoot, and both parties agreed to them.

And if a model raises there rates becasue a photographer may make money chance are that creative will look elsewhere thats just how it is. super popular models can charge what they want regarless of shoot type because they are busy.

Edited by ANDY00

Sensual Art said, 1729340299

If you want to quantify the value you're getting from a shoot, you first have to qualify that value.

For me, there are various combinations of:

  • Bringing a vague idea for a picture to life
  • Planning the shoot
  • Getting out and meeting new people
  • Getting out and going to new places
  • The shoot itself, which typically involves the collaborative discussions mid-way, reviewing pictures on the back of the camera, refining angles, lights, props etc to improve the result (and is most enjoyable for me if it does) 
  • The chat that inevitably happens in between taking pictures
  • The buzz that comes from knowing that we did something new and interesting
  • The review of the pictures afterwards
  • The joy of sharing the results with others
  • The joy that comes when other people who their appreciation with a handful of crumbs such as loves and comments
  • The joy that comes if the model herself Loves the image
  • The little buzz if she leaves me a reference
  • The anticipation of "what if" with ranges of possibilities for what else we could do together.

Yup, it's an expensive hobby, but if I'm getting that kind of feedback, it's been time and money well spent.  It's certainly a far better feeling than a subscription to Netflix could bring, for example!

The Ghost said, 1729340475

ANDY00 said

Tabitha Boydell said

ANDY00 a models commercial rate will be higher than her rate for non commercial

For example, a popular model on here is £400 a day. If you want her to sign a release to use the images commercially (e.g profit from their use) then it doubles. I know this because a photographer asked for a rate to use the images from a workshop commercially. Model may also agree to a profit share instead but because this is never known at the time of the shoot, she may well be better off with her commercial rate.

The extra fee is rightly charged, in my opinion. If it was work for a brand in the ‘real world’ and not the PP bubble then you’d be looking at that rate PLUS a buyout of 1-2k or even more depending on usage. One car brand that I know of, advertised a job with a 20k buyout


Firstly, if you hire a model for a shoot, you own the copyright to the images—you don’t need a release to sell them. Secondly, many models do paid work and receive images, which they then sell on platforms like OnlyFans and Patreon without lowering their rates or obtaining written consent from the photographer. A shoot is a shoot: if you pay a model, you own the copyright and can use the images as you see fit. There’s no expectation to disclose how the images will be used after the shoot

All true but good luck getting a commercial entity to pay you for images without a release. Also good luck finding anyone to work with you after breaching the first person’s trust - people talk.

ANDY00 said, 1729340979

The Ghost said

ANDY00 said

Tabitha Boydell said

ANDY00 a models commercial rate will be higher than her rate for non commercial

For example, a popular model on here is £400 a day. If you want her to sign a release to use the images commercially (e.g profit from their use) then it doubles. I know this because a photographer asked for a rate to use the images from a workshop commercially. Model may also agree to a profit share instead but because this is never known at the time of the shoot, she may well be better off with her commercial rate.

The extra fee is rightly charged, in my opinion. If it was work for a brand in the ‘real world’ and not the PP bubble then you’d be looking at that rate PLUS a buyout of 1-2k or even more depending on usage. One car brand that I know of, advertised a job with a 20k buyout


Firstly, if you hire a model for a shoot, you own the copyright to the images—you don’t need a release to sell them. Secondly, many models do paid work and receive images, which they then sell on platforms like OnlyFans and Patreon without lowering their rates or obtaining written consent from the photographer. A shoot is a shoot: if you pay a model, you own the copyright and can use the images as you see fit. There’s no expectation to disclose how the images will be used after the shoot

All true but good luck getting a commercial entity to pay you for images without a release. Also good luck finding anyone to work with you after breaching the first person’s trust - people talk.


Like models with OnlyFans ? Or Patreon ? Or any of the countless other platforms now, like X, Live, etc.? None of these platforms require release forms. So, are they breaking the law? Technically, the models definitely are if they’re using images without the photographer’s consent or knowlege commercially to gain money, while the platforms operate in a legal grey area. There are plenty of photographers on here who say they have their own OnlyFans, etc., so photographers are doing it as well, but they have the copyright.... copyright is the trump card

 

Edited by ANDY00

Huw said, 1729341310

Orson Carter said, 1729341452

Sensual Art said

If you want to quantify the value you're getting from a shoot, you first have to qualify that value.

...Yup, it's an expensive hobby, but if I'm getting that kind of feedback, it's been time and money well spent.  It's certainly a far better feeling than a subscription to Netflix could bring, for example!


I don't have Netflix, but there is a parallel...

I love football and I used to be a season ticket holder at Bristol City. Spending a day working with a good model gives an umpteen times better feeling than I'd get at Ashton Gate these days.  

Edited by Orson Carter

JME Studios said, 1729341338

@Golding I'm in a similar position now. I've just done a search for under 30, shoot topless, 20 miles and logged in during the last fortnight.

That takes in Leicester, Coventry, the university town of Loughborough and the east of Birmingham.

Six models.

Take "last logged" off? 53.

We are in our Autumn era.

Tabitha Boydell said, 1729341366