PP minimum age

I suspect other routes to being a model of whatever sort at 18 are more hazardous than joining PP at 16, with rules as they are, or modified in some way to be suggested.

I've been involved in a couple of shoots of under-18s, and everyone involved has been careful and sensible.

I think those who are not careful and sensible will be less observed and constrained outside PP than within it.

CalmNudes said

Unfocussed Mike said

CalmNudes said

I can't find the casting in question so that may have happened already.

It has not. :-O

I found it by changing search terms. Could be innocent, but someone wanting a stick to beat PP with would go "A-ha!" 

It doesn't have enough information in it to _demonstrably_ break rules, I agree. But as Holly Alexander says, it's about context. And it feels obviously wrong. It lacks any information that sets up an appropriate context.

Purpleport should, I think, feel free to delete castings without prejudice (as it were, to repurpose a legal term) if they think they are an obviously bad look. As if to say: resubmit this casting with information that makes the intent more clear, for everyone's benefit. (If that is indeed possible in this case!)

Not least because castings are available to non-logged-in users. This is a tabloid nightmare waiting to happen.

Edited by Unfocussed Mike

I would usually say that the more controlled area that is pp is safer…

But the fact that this this was posted by someone who in 3 years on here has accrued 1 single reference - and then they post this …. It certainly doesn’t look good.

CalmNudes said

Gothic Image said

Personally I'd be more worried about "a school themed shoot".  :-(

 Editorial and catalogue possibilities wouldn't be described like that. 

I missed this comment at first, and agree. TBH those could be banned outright here and no one's art or rights would suffer.

Edited by Unfocussed Mike