PNG format images
The Portrait Cowboy said, 1729529274
Sensual Art not to mention if an image is posted in the groups, that would have yet another colour background 👍🏻
Sensual Art said, 1729529545
The Portrait Cowboy said
Sensual Art not to mention if an image is posted in the groups, that would have yet another colour background 👍🏻
Hush, I've not even got as far as the drop shadow yet ;)
The Portrait Cowboy said, 1729530394
Sensual Art Ha, sorry!
Also, transparent backgrounds allow for the cropping or framing of images that don't conform to square or rectangular shapes.
Russ Freeman (staff) said, 1729541457
Does anyone have any links to such images on IG so I can see how they look in context?
Sensual Art said, 1729614681
Russ Freeman said
Does anyone have any links to such images on IG so I can see how they look in context?
Instagram has its own failings when it comes to PNG support.
Are we really going to be held back simply because some unrelated site behaves in a particular way?
Russ Freeman (staff) said, 1729615348
Sensual Art said
Russ Freeman said
Does anyone have any links to such images on IG so I can see how they look in context?
Instagram has its own failings when it comes to PNG support.
Are we really going to be held back simply because some unrelated site behaves in a particular way?
No, of course not. If there is anything that will mean we don't adopt PNGs as well as JPGs it will be the cost/benefit of it.
ANDY00 said, 1729615777
Honest question here, as I genuinely don’t know: what can you do with a PNG that you can’t do with a JPG, other than file size and transparency? And what would you even use transparency for on a photography site? I mean, you can still host images on other sites and link them into a post or your portfolio here if it’s just about transparency or making GIFs, can’t you?
waist.it said, 1729625509
Sensual Art said
Russ Freeman said
Does anyone have any links to such images on IG so I can see how they look in context?
Instagram has its own failings when it comes to PNG support.
Are we really going to be held back simply because some unrelated site behaves in a particular way?
I don't have an Instagram account, and I'd really prefer not to get one. However, I have prepared a couple of simple quadriptyches, from layers within an existing *.xcf - the same source that I used to create the webp animation demo in an earlier post.
They are essentially the same 1920px * 1080px WEBP file, with just one small but significant difference. One has its "#ffffff" colour (and only "ffffff") set to "transparent", the other does not. When displayed on PP using the default site CSS, with its slightly off-white background, there is little visible difference. However, when displayed using a dark theme, say by Darkreader or similar, the difference is quite noticeable.
Transparent border (20231229-gx80-beck-lens-vorsatz-bellows-borders-transp.webp)
Solid white border (20231229-gx80-beck-lens-vorsatz-bellows-borders-solid-fff.webp)
NB. I've used WEBP in this instance rather than PNG to decrease the file size. But the same basic logic would apply to PNG files too. The files are actually located on one of my servers, rather than hosted here on PP. HTH. :-)
Edited by waist.it
-spâ—Źâ—Źn- said, 1729626421
Given that every browser supports webp, it would be better to spend the effort on implementing webp than png:
https://caniuse.com/webp
Huw said, 1729626642
Sensual Art said
Russ Freeman said
Does anyone have any links to such images on IG so I can see how they look in context?
Instagram has its own failings when it comes to PNG support.
Are we really going to be held back simply because some unrelated site behaves in a particular way?
Instagram is quite an important "unrelated site"....
Seems a lot of work to fix something that isn't broken :)
Sensual Art said, 1729627186
-spâ—Źâ—Źn- said
Given that every browser supports webp, it would be better to spend the effort on implementing webp than png:
Which browsers don't support PNG?
Sensual Art said, 1729627344
Huw said
Seems a lot of work to fix something that isn't broken :)
So you're saying that you wouldn't want to use this new feature yourself.
Request another feature instead, then, that you'd rather PP spend its development effort on.
Huw said, 1729627559
Sensual Art said
Huw said
Seems a lot of work to fix something that isn't broken :)
So you're saying that you wouldn't want to use this new feature yourself.
Request another feature instead, then, that you'd rather PP spend its development effort on.
I did, and PP provided it :)
Change to 1080px wide for uploads so I could use the same jpg for PP and IG ;)
Sensual Art said, 1729627653
Huw And now you're begrudging someone else the chance for a new feature?
Huw said, 1729627794
Sensual Art said
Huw And now you're begrudging someone else the chance for a new feature?
It's more that I'm lazy, and I don't really understand the advantages either....
Happy to be educated.
:)