Not active

ANDY00 said

Allesandro B said

ANDY00 said

Allesandro B said

ANDY00 said

To be honest, I have to ask myself what people's motivations are. I can clearly see the benefits the site gets from keeping dead and inactive accounts alive, and I understand the motivations of those who want the dead weight cleared. But for those fighting tooth and nail to keep accounts that have been inactive for years visible, I just can't see a credible reason. Years is a long time, really. Do you think those users are going to mind that they aren't showing up in photographers' or models' searches if they haven't logged in for so long? I just don't see it. And if all they needed to do was log in to reactivate, is that really such a bad thing? If they truly don’t want to return and log in, why are we holding on to all their stuff? :-)  And if they have to come back to reactivate, who knows, maybe they’ll have a shoot or two while they’re here. it's an incentive to participate.

Edited by ANDY00

I fail to understand why this is an issue and why people are trying to influence what happens to other people's portfolios. If you don't want to see the portfolios of people who haven't logged in for however long just filter them out. The search facility makes them invisible to you. 

It's nobody else's business if someone wants to maintain a presence, not log in and not delete their account. They might want to return at some point and if the management of PP say that's ok then it's ok.

There are photographers here who log in here every day, have been members since the year dot but haven't shot for years and from that you could summise they are never going to shoot again, well they aren't much use to models searching for photographers to work with are they? Maybe they should be given the heave ho to I mean what are their motivations for being here? 

The pandemic caused a big shift in the gig economy, many models shifted away to other things including OF, I think that will change, there have been a few models returning recently. Whether that's because flashing their fanny on OF isn't quite as lucrative as it was or they genuinely miss shooting who knows but I say let's live and let live and just get on with your own life.

I completely fail to see how your response is connected to my comment in any way. Firstly, nobody is suggesting what should be done with anyone's portfolios—this is about visibility, not deletion or forced action. It’s a non-destructive approach that simply removes long-term inactive profiles from searches, which is a standard practice on most social platforms across the internet. If someone hasn’t logged into the site for over a year, they’re clearly not actively participating. And if all it takes to reappear in searches is logging back in, where’s the harm? It encourages people to stay engaged with the site, while also keeping searches relevant for those looking for active collaborators. It’s not about controlling anyone’s portfolio or account, just about maintaining an active and productive community and encouraging participation.

It doesn't prevent people from messaging them, it doesn’t affect any FPIs they’ve earned, and it doesn’t alter their portfolio in any way. The only change is that long-term inactive profiles would be hidden from active members' searches. They can still be found by those directly searching for them or in images they are tagged in, and everything stays intact, waiting for them to log in and become active again. It’s just about keeping search results relevant and decluttered, not erasing anyone’s presence or accomplishments.

Since you felt the need to quote my question out of context, why not answer it directly? Why exactly do you want to keep 3-5 year inactive accounts active in searches? What personal benefit do you get from it? I’m genuinely curious. How does a model's portfolio, untouched and inactive for 5 years, positively influence your use of the site? Because, to be honest, it feels like you're defending the haunted house section and I’m not sure why. Enlighten me.

Oh, and your line 'There are photographers here who log in every day'—yes, exactly! They log in every day, or frequently, or even monthly. That’s the point—they participate in the community, unlike those who haven’t logged in for 5 years. It’s not really the same thing, is it? And sure, people get older and may not be able to do as much as they once did for multiple reasons, and that’s perfectly fine. They can still be involved in other capacities within the community or take a break—that’s their choice, nobody is saying they cant in any way

 

Edited by ANDY00

I've answered your question, how long someone's account has been inactive is absolutely none of my business. Just because someone hasn't logged for a while in doesn't mean they are not "using" the site (albeit not in the way you want them to). It's still a portfolio presence and it may have a link to somewhere where they are more active.

It's all academic, the facility exists to filter the profiles you don't want to see and most importantly Russ has said it's not happening.

Mmmhmm, so your big argument is that they might not be on the site but somehow they're still using it—telepathy, maybe? If the account has been inactive for 1 to 5 years and they haven't logged in, they certainly aren’t picking up the mail, are they?

And still, the only big argument from the 'keep inactive accounts visible' crowd is, 'You can change the search filter every time you search'—, right? Oh, and let’s not forget the telepathy theory—maybe they’re using their mind powers to pick up their messages after being offline for five years. Makes total sense, great Debating points :-)

Edited by ANDY00

Its called Instagram, there are loads of models who were here 3 years ago who aren't active here the way you want them to be but they are still modelling and their port here will have those details.  Its hard to search for models on Instagram it's easy here. 

If you make them invisible by default like you want to then they won't be discovered. 

Yes I keep going back to the point you can filter them out because that's all you have to do..

Gerry99111 said

The site does allow you to hide the inactive accounts in search and you can even choose how long the period of inactivity is that results in them not being visible. What is actually wrong with that? How are you adversely affected?

If you want to find someone for whatever reason you can. What is wrong with that?

If you are an ex model and just want to show someone your old model page without logging in, you can, what is wrong with that?

The owner has stated they won't be hiding or deactivating accounts, what is wrong with that?

You can look up an old account if you suspect a new account to be fake. What is wrong with that?

You have all the personal choices you could want. You just don't get to decide what is best for others just because you don't like it

With my sugguestion you would still be able to do all those things :- whats wrong with that ? :-) youve added nothing to the debate lol 

Allesandro B said

ANDY00 said

Allesandro B said

ANDY00 said

Allesandro B said

ANDY00 said

To be honest, I have to ask myself what people's motivations are. I can clearly see the benefits the site gets from keeping dead and inactive accounts alive, and I understand the motivations of those who want the dead weight cleared. But for those fighting tooth and nail to keep accounts that have been inactive for years visible, I just can't see a credible reason. Years is a long time, really. Do you think those users are going to mind that they aren't showing up in photographers' or models' searches if they haven't logged in for so long? I just don't see it. And if all they needed to do was log in to reactivate, is that really such a bad thing? If they truly don’t want to return and log in, why are we holding on to all their stuff? :-)  And if they have to come back to reactivate, who knows, maybe they’ll have a shoot or two while they’re here. it's an incentive to participate.

Edited by ANDY00

I fail to understand why this is an issue and why people are trying to influence what happens to other people's portfolios. If you don't want to see the portfolios of people who haven't logged in for however long just filter them out. The search facility makes them invisible to you. 

It's nobody else's business if someone wants to maintain a presence, not log in and not delete their account. They might want to return at some point and if the management of PP say that's ok then it's ok.

There are photographers here who log in here every day, have been members since the year dot but haven't shot for years and from that you could summise they are never going to shoot again, well they aren't much use to models searching for photographers to work with are they? Maybe they should be given the heave ho to I mean what are their motivations for being here? 

The pandemic caused a big shift in the gig economy, many models shifted away to other things including OF, I think that will change, there have been a few models returning recently. Whether that's because flashing their fanny on OF isn't quite as lucrative as it was or they genuinely miss shooting who knows but I say let's live and let live and just get on with your own life.

I completely fail to see how your response is connected to my comment in any way. Firstly, nobody is suggesting what should be done with anyone's portfolios—this is about visibility, not deletion or forced action. It’s a non-destructive approach that simply removes long-term inactive profiles from searches, which is a standard practice on most social platforms across the internet. If someone hasn’t logged into the site for over a year, they’re clearly not actively participating. And if all it takes to reappear in searches is logging back in, where’s the harm? It encourages people to stay engaged with the site, while also keeping searches relevant for those looking for active collaborators. It’s not about controlling anyone’s portfolio or account, just about maintaining an active and productive community and encouraging participation.

It doesn't prevent people from messaging them, it doesn’t affect any FPIs they’ve earned, and it doesn’t alter their portfolio in any way. The only change is that long-term inactive profiles would be hidden from active members' searches. They can still be found by those directly searching for them or in images they are tagged in, and everything stays intact, waiting for them to log in and become active again. It’s just about keeping search results relevant and decluttered, not erasing anyone’s presence or accomplishments.

Since you felt the need to quote my question out of context, why not answer it directly? Why exactly do you want to keep 3-5 year inactive accounts active in searches? What personal benefit do you get from it? I’m genuinely curious. How does a model's portfolio, untouched and inactive for 5 years, positively influence your use of the site? Because, to be honest, it feels like you're defending the haunted house section and I’m not sure why. Enlighten me.

Oh, and your line 'There are photographers here who log in every day'—yes, exactly! They log in every day, or frequently, or even monthly. That’s the point—they participate in the community, unlike those who haven’t logged in for 5 years. It’s not really the same thing, is it? And sure, people get older and may not be able to do as much as they once did for multiple reasons, and that’s perfectly fine. They can still be involved in other capacities within the community or take a break—that’s their choice, nobody is saying they cant in any way

 

Edited by ANDY00

I've answered your question, how long someone's account has been inactive is absolutely none of my business. Just because someone hasn't logged for a while in doesn't mean they are not "using" the site (albeit not in the way you want them to). It's still a portfolio presence and it may have a link to somewhere where they are more active.

It's all academic, the facility exists to filter the profiles you don't want to see and most importantly Russ has said it's not happening.

Mmmhmm, so your big argument is that they might not be on the site but somehow they're still using it—telepathy, maybe? If the account has been inactive for 1 to 5 years and they haven't logged in, they certainly aren’t picking up the mail, are they?

And still, the only big argument from the 'keep inactive accounts visible' crowd is, 'You can change the search filter every time you search'—, right? Oh, and let’s not forget the telepathy theory—maybe they’re using their mind powers to pick up their messages after being offline for five years. Makes total sense, great Debating points :-)

Edited by ANDY00

Its called Instagram, there are loads of models who were here 3 years ago who aren't active here the way you want them to be but they are still modelling and their port here will have those details.  Its hard to search for models on Instagram it's easy here. 

If you make them invisible by default like you want to then they won't be discovered. 

Yes I keep going back to the point you can filter them out because that's all you have to do..

If they're on Instagram, then guess what? They're contactable on—wait for it—Instagram! And they can still share a link to their portfolio here if they want. That wouldn’t change, would it?

And those accounts that have been inactive for 1-5 years don’t seem to care if they’re discovered—they’re not picking up the mail, are they?

Edited by ANDY00

ANDY00 said

Gerry99111 said

The site does allow you to hide the inactive accounts in search and you can even choose how long the period of inactivity is that results in them not being visible. What is actually wrong with that? How are you adversely affected?

If you want to find someone for whatever reason you can. What is wrong with that?

If you are an ex model and just want to show someone your old model page without logging in, you can, what is wrong with that?

The owner has stated they won't be hiding or deactivating accounts, what is wrong with that?

You can look up an old account if you suspect a new account to be fake. What is wrong with that?

You have all the personal choices you could want. You just don't get to decide what is best for others just because you don't like it

With my sugguestion you would still be able to do all those things :- whats wrong with that ? :-) youve added nothing to the debate lol 

What debate? There isn't one.

The biggest joke of all is some people have asked for memorial accounts to be kept so people can remember past members who died and some one else wants to see everything hidden from everyone else if it doesn't meet with their own selfish standards.

The site even goes to the trouble of giving us plenty of tools to customise what and who we see.

Never underestimate the desire of men of a certain age wanting to control or limit what others can do

indemnity said

ANDY00 said

Gerry99111 said

The site does allow you to hide the inactive accounts in search and you can even choose how long the period of inactivity is that results in them not being visible. What is actually wrong with that? How are you adversely affected?

If you want to find someone for whatever reason you can. What is wrong with that?

If you are an ex model and just want to show someone your old model page without logging in, you can, what is wrong with that?

The owner has stated they won't be hiding or deactivating accounts, what is wrong with that?

You can look up an old account if you suspect a new account to be fake. What is wrong with that?

You have all the personal choices you could want. You just don't get to decide what is best for others just because you don't like it

With my sugguestion you would still be able to do all those things :- whats wrong with that ? :-) youve added nothing to the debate lol 

What debate? There isn't one.

Just because Russ has said it's not changing doesn’t mean the discussion has to stop, and it hasn’t. Some people are presenting valid points for it, while those against are arguing for telepathy. But it’s still a forum debate, isn’t it? a conversation.....

Glad that is all settled, we are staying as we are and people can individually hide what they want and all other talk is just pointless hot air

Gerry99111 said

The biggest joke of all is some people have asked for memorial accounts to be kept so people can remember past members who died and some one else wants to see everything hidden from everyone else if it doesn't meet with their own selfish standards.

The site even goes to the trouble of giving us plenty of tools to customise what and who we see.

Never underestimate the desire of men of a certain age wanting to control or limit what others can do

None of that would change would it.......... the accounts would still be directly searchable, and would still be alive

ANDY00 said

FarmerSteve said

ANDY00 because a member not being active on this site doesn't mean that they aren't active elsewhere - seeing their profile on here might get the searcher to look elsewhere to find that person. Or seeing images that person has been involved in creating may give someone some inspiration. As someone arguing for a change it's down to you to justify that change - given that the functionality you want us already there, albeit not the default setting, I don't see that you've made a particularly strong case for changing it. Note that you can also save the "Active Within" as part of your default search parameters.

I would guess that every member who’s no longer active on this site is active somewhere else, but I fail to see how that’s relevant to this discussion in any way or this site in anyway. As I've clearly explained, having an account that’s been inactive for 1-5 years not showing up in searches doesn’t stop people from messaging them. They’d still show up in direct searches or tagged images. Their images would still be here, and their FPIs would remain untouched. Have you actually read any of this? It seems like you’re just replying blindly without any consideration of the options being proposed, you are litrally answering jibberish. 

FarmerSteve - "I don't see that you've made a particularly strong case for changing it." thats rubbish ive offered a fair and balanced reason throughout, you simply and clearly havent read them or you wouldnt be adding uninformed replies, maybe go back and read what i actually sugguested and offer a real reason why having long term innactive accounts in every search helps anyone. 

Edited by ANDY00

Let's make this simple then - why should your preference to not see "inactive" profiles affect my preference to be able to see them if I so choose?  And in particular why should that be so when you already have the tools available to facilitate your preference.

ANDY00 said

Just because Russ has said it's not changing doesn’t mean the discussion has to stop, and it hasn’t. Some people are presenting valid points for it, while those against are arguing for telepathy. But it’s still a forum debate, isn’t it? a conversation.....

Hmmm... Not sure about that. From where I'm sitting, it's turned into as showcase for those who suffer from Acute MHLW Syndrome*. 

[* Must Have Last Word Syndrome]

FarmerSteve said

ANDY00 said

FarmerSteve said

ANDY00 because a member not being active on this site doesn't mean that they aren't active elsewhere - seeing their profile on here might get the searcher to look elsewhere to find that person. Or seeing images that person has been involved in creating may give someone some inspiration. As someone arguing for a change it's down to you to justify that change - given that the functionality you want us already there, albeit not the default setting, I don't see that you've made a particularly strong case for changing it. Note that you can also save the "Active Within" as part of your default search parameters.

I would guess that every member who’s no longer active on this site is active somewhere else, but I fail to see how that’s relevant to this discussion in any way or this site in anyway. As I've clearly explained, having an account that’s been inactive for 1-5 years not showing up in searches doesn’t stop people from messaging them. They’d still show up in direct searches or tagged images. Their images would still be here, and their FPIs would remain untouched. Have you actually read any of this? It seems like you’re just replying blindly without any consideration of the options being proposed, you are litrally answering jibberish. 

FarmerSteve - "I don't see that you've made a particularly strong case for changing it." thats rubbish ive offered a fair and balanced reason throughout, you simply and clearly havent read them or you wouldnt be adding uninformed replies, maybe go back and read what i actually sugguested and offer a real reason why having long term innactive accounts in every search helps anyone. 

Edited by ANDY00

Let's make this simple then - why should your preference to not see "inactive" profiles affect my preference to be able to see them if I so choose?  And in particular why should that be so when you already have the tools available to facilitate your preference.

That’s the point of the OP’s post, isn’t it? To gauge the arguments for and against keeping them visible. To be honest, the reasons for keeping them visible in every search are weak at best, but that’s democracy. And as has been said, Russ is leaning toward your side of the discussion, but that doesn’t mean we can’t talk about it. Or is that not allowed either? Am I stealing your argument too? :-)

Clearly, more people search for active accounts than inactive ones. How often do you actually search for an inactive account? The ability to find them wouldn’t change, but if 99.9% of searches are for active accounts and only 0.001% are for inactive ones, I don’t really get your argument. People searching for inactive accounts would still be able to find them either way.

Leaving them costs nothing.

It won't upset the owner of the account.

Changing the system costs something.

Set the filter.

Orson Carter said

ANDY00 said

Just because Russ has said it's not changing doesn’t mean the discussion has to stop, and it hasn’t. Some people are presenting valid points for it, while those against are arguing for telepathy. But it’s still a forum debate, isn’t it? a conversation.....

Hmmm... Not sure about that. From where I'm sitting, it's turned into as showcase for those who suffer from Acute MHLW Syndrome*. 

[* Must Have Last Word Syndrome]

What happens to a conversation when people stop responding? without replies, the conversation naturally fades. So, isn’t MHLWS  just a tactic used in forums to deliberately end a discussion that not going the way they want? :-) 

You see how that worked? You said something, I replied—conversation in action! it's rude not to reply :-)

Edited by ANDY00

I sometimes want to look at inactive accounts.

CalmNudes said

Seeing who is complaining about lurkers makes me smile. 

Ditto.🤣